Allison
JJ, Kiefe CI, Centor RM, Box JB, Farmer RM.
Racial differences in the medical treatment of elderly Medicare patients
with acute myocardial infarction.
J Gen Intern Med 1996;11(12):736-43.
Despite the increasing literature suggesting racial disparities in invasive
cardiac care, few studies have examined differences in cardiac noninvasive
care. Allison et al. used discharge data from all acute care hospitals
in Alabama from June 1992 through February 1993 to examine the differences
in the use of thrombolysis, beta-adrenergic blockade and aspirin among
patients diagnosed with Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI). The population
was restricted to African American and Caucasian Medicare beneficiaries
over 65 years of age. Race was the primary independent variable and other
covariates, including determined candidacy for therapy (ideal patient
status), age, gender, hospital variables (rural vs. urban, teaching vs.
nonteaching, number of AMIs treated), and severity of illness, were entered
separately into a multivariate model.
The crude analysis of the data did not show a statistically significant
difference in the therapeutic use of beta-adrenergic blockade and aspirin.
However, a significant difference was found for the use of thrombolysis
– 9.2% of African-Americans received thrombolysis versus 17.3% of
Caucasians. When ideal candidacy by algorithm was factored in, 50% of
black patients deemed to be ideal candidates received thrombolysis compared
to 68% of white patients. The analysis including all other covariates
yielded an adjusted odds ratio of .55 (95% CI: 0.41-0.77) for blacks versus
whites receiving thrombolysis. No difference was found in the use of aspirin
and beta-blockers.
The authors conclude that “this inequality persisted even after
adjustment for severity of illness and comorbidity.” It “appears
that African Americans received less thrombolysis both when they were
ideal candidates and when they were not ideal candidates,” and “the
overall racial disparity was not due to administration of thrombolytic
agents to Caucasians for ‘softer’ indications (overuse).”
Additionally, “the analysis did not find hospital characteristics
to be significant predictors.” The investigators conclude that their
“analysis suggests (but does not prove) that this resulted from
inappropriately withholding treatment from African Americans.”
The authors also note, “Some propose that cultural experience produces
distrust of the medical system leading to a high rate of refusal of technological
interventions…our data suggest that this is not the case because
the same percentage of African Americans and Caucasians refused treatment."